Tuck in Your Shirt and Put on a Belt
April 08, 2011, By Christopher Ford 42 comments
A few months ago fellow Man of the House writer P.K. Lassiter wrote a piece called "4 Reasons Men Should Not Tuck In A Shirt," and for some reason it has really stuck with me (and with 240 comments and counting, apparently it's not only me). While I appreciate his point of view that tucking in your shirt can make you look nerdy, old fashioned and (shudder) fat, I think there are far more occasions when a man should tuck in his shirt than not.
Before I get too deep into this debate, I want to mention a problem I see all the time with the way men dress. Guys, it's not 1985 anymore. A man should ALWAYS wear a belt. If your pants (or shorts, or whatever you're wearing) have belt loops, then you should be wearing a belt. Always. If your pants have waist adjusters or are made for suspenders then you are off the hook, but otherwise put a belt on. Even if your shirt is out and covering your belt loops, you should be wearing a belt. Trust me. Not wearing a belt makes you look like you don't care about your appearance and like maybe you should go back to exclusively wearing drawstring sweatpants like you did in college.
Generally speaking, a shirt is supposed to be tucked into your pants, and in fact the majority of shirts are designed to be tucked in. Every time a man doesn't tuck in his shirt it's a choice--a deliberate choice--and is usually made by someone younger than the average Man of the House reader. It's OK, and sometimes appropriate, to not tuck in your shirt, but know that by doing so you're making a choice.
Here's a rundown…
1. The button-down Oxford and/or "dress shirt."
Since P.K. was talking about social situations only, I'll just agree with him and reiterate that in any formal or business situation, your shirt must be tucked in whether your boss wants you to or not. But even if you're going out and wearing just a shirt without a tie, it really should be tucked in. If you have a regular physique like most of us (which is to say you aren't exactly sporting a six-pack in the abs department) then you may have to do a little extra work to find a shirt that fits you properly. I realize most guys hate shopping, but with a little effort you can find the shirt perfect for you. Often sizes and cuts will vary even within the same store, so you have to try things on to make sure they fit. Choose a shirt that's not so tight the buttons pucker under the strain of your gut but isn't so baggy that it looks like you're swimming in it. The cuffs should end just barely past your wrists, and the seam at the shoulder should end at your shoulder, not halfway down your arm.
If you get a shirt that fits you right and it's tucked in behind a belt (and your pants also fit and are not pulled up too high) it will always look sharp. Remember, it's not the shirt that makes you look fat; it's your fat that makes you look fat. But even the most portly of us can find one that looks good. Leaving your shirt untucked is OK in some situations, like if the shirt is particularly decorative or if it's cut to not be tucked in (the same length at the hips as in the front and back). But it's a lot easier for it to look sloppy than cool, so take special care.
2. The t-shirt.
Maybe this is a clarification, but a t-shirt should always be tucked in when it's not the outermost piece of clothing that you're wearing. Any t-shirt underneath another shirt, sweater, pull-over sweatshirt (or even a hooded sweatshirt you don't intend to take it off) should be tucked in. Always. Having two untucked layers always looks sloppy and in my opinion is also kind of uncomfortable.
When you're wearing just a t-shirt with jeans or shorts and nothing else over it, then I'm in full agreement. A tucked-in t-shirt makes you look as lame as you're trying not to look. It's almost as bad as socks with sandals. Again, just make sure that the t-shirt isn't baggy. Just because you're in a casual situation doesn't mean you have to look sloppy.
NEXT: The Jersey


Comments (42):